Skip to main content

Bloody Lawyers! A rant about lawyers by a lawyer

It’s not often that on a legal recruitment blog about lawyers we rant a lot about lawyers as probably just about everyone reading this is a lawyer, but this is a rant about lawyers and I make no apology for it before starting!

Ten Percent Legal Recruitment over the years has offered numerous free services and then instantly regretted offering them, because people always want more than the free service offers, or they view it as a free service and simply don’t bother going ahead. 

Free CV Reviews

One of the remnants of our free services is our free CV review which, although we no longer advertise, still exists on our website and comes up quite prominently in any searches where somebody types in ‘free legal CV’ or ‘free legal CV review’.

Information Published

The free legal CV review has a rather large catch with it, which is that if you send us your CV for a free legal CV review we will take your name and contact details off of it and publish it on our website along with our feedback on the CV. For those who do not want their CV published on the website together with our feedback, there is the option to purchase a legal CV review from our legal careers shop, a service we have been offering for many years and well below the actual cost price.

The free legal CV review gets used about once a month by law students, graduates, paralegals and occasionally solicitors, and this article is a rant about a qualified lawyer who recently came to use the service.

The webpage for the free legal CV review is very specific, and in fact looking back at it as something I wrote back in 2014, it is a little bit rude. We state very clearly that if you send us the CV we reserve the right to be as blunt and to the point about it as we like, and we will definitely publish the CV along with our guidance and advice on our website and we will not accept any email correspondence in relation to it. 

Paid Reviews only £65

The cost of a paid CV review is £65, and for this our clients get a full CV review by one of our directors, together with a full breakdown of everything that’s right or wrong with it and suggestions on improvement, together with a further CV check. The actual cost of this service is probably somewhere closer to around £250 in terms of our director’s time, but we’ve always enjoyed giving legal careers advice and so it’s almost a bit of a philanthropic gesture for us to provide the service at well below cost price. 

The free CV review goes one step further and in fact has only any value at all to us if we’re able to publish the review on our website for others to see and to follow our advice accordingly, which is why we offer the free CV review service (and make it very clear on the website).

Senior Legal Counsel - Free Review

A few weeks ago we received a CV from a senior legal counsel based in London and with extensive background in the banking and finance sectors. This particular lawyer had requested a free CV review.

We completed the CV review, which, it has to be said, was particularly complex because this particular lawyer had extensive experience and we needed to read it all, blanked their name, most recent firm and contact details off their CV and posted the CV together with the extensive advice from one of our directors onto our website. We then sent the lawyer a link to their CV and our feedback.

We were expecting a quick email back to say, “Wow that’s wonderful, thank you very much for your efforts, most appreciated, and what a great service you offer to lawyers without actually charging them,” but alas this was not the case. Today we received an email from the lawyer advising us that, although they were aware of our terms and conditions in relation to the CV and it being published on our website, they wanted us to remove the CV from the website because it identified them through their previous work history and experience and skills. 

Free Services - never straightforward

We refused point blank to remove the CV from our website, pointed out the terms they had agreed to when they sent it to us, and suggested that if there was anything identifying them on the CV that was on our website, they should tell us and we could remove it, but under no circumstances were we removing the CV or the article from our website having completed it. I did politely suggest that if the lawyer wanted to have a private CV review then they were very welcome to pay the £65 and I would delete the CV. We await their response!

Rant about Freebies

So this article is essentially a rant about providing free services with an altruistic intention and immediately finding that in fact it is more trouble than it’s worth, because people never appreciate why a service is being provided and always want something more regardless of what it is. The person who has contacted us has indicated to us that they are fully aware that one of the conditions of the service is that we are able to publish the CV and our feedback on the website, but has then gone completely against this and asked for it to be removed. 

I’m still slightly annoyed that a service that was more suited to law students and graduates who may not have £65 to pay us to do a professional review has been exploited by a very senior lawyer who no doubt is earning a six figure salary (or capable of earning a six figure salary) but still chose to use the free service and then not just satisfied with that, has then attempted to get round this and get the same service as the paid service by threatening us to remove their CV from our website.

Disappearing Service

This will probably be coming up at our next board meeting, and I suspect the free CV review will be disappearing from our website sometime soon as the directors will not be wanting to be bothered messing about with ridiculous claims like this one. 

Disastrous Free Job Creation Scheme

It takes me back to when we first set the company up and had the great idea of offering a free job creation scheme to paralegals and graduates. We would enable law firms to contact us to request details of non-qualified or experienced recent graduates, and to just pay us a £50 fee if they were to take anybody on. We found within about six months that this simply didn’t work, not because we didn’t get anybody enquiries from graduates or firms – we got loads – but that when we actually found a couple of people good quality jobs through it, they either turned up for a few days and then disappeared or simply didn’t turn up at all, which left us needing to look around for someone else, all for the price of £50. This was utterly and completely uneconomic and made the company directors at the time so annoyed we decided we would never be doing anything like this again. 

Free services never work

When you offer a service for next to nothing or nothing, it’s almost guaranteed that this will cause you more headaches than a service that you offer at a reasonable price, and I guess the difference is that when you’re offering it for next to nothing, when something goes wrong you immediately get more annoyed than you would have done if someone had challenged a service you were offering and getting paid the correct amount for. 

Okay, that’s the end of the rant and I hope the senior lawyer in this case doesn’t decide to threaten us with all kinds of different actions, but we shall see!

Jonathan Fagan is Managing Director of Ten-Percent Legal Recruitment and a non-practising Solicitor. Ten-Percent Legal Recruitment provides online Legal Recruitment for Solicitors, Legal Executives, Licensed Conveyancers, Legal Cashiers, Fee Earners, Support Staff, Managers and Paralegals. Visit our Website to search our Vacancy Database.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Overpaid Charity CEOs - top 40 of high paid employees - updated 2022

In 2014, we wrote an article about high pay in the charity sector after the Charity Commission started to require all charities to disclose pay of senior executives earning more than £60,000.    We have updated the list for 2022, with a comparison chart so you can see the difference between 2014 and 2022. We have included the source of the most recent salary levels and the year refers to the accounts year we extracted the salary information from.   2022 Top 40 Chart of High Paying Charities Charity Highest salary Year Consumers’ Association £390k-£400k 2020 MSI Reproductive Choices £240k-£250k 2020 Save the Children International £285k-£300k 2020 Cancer Research UK £240k-£250k 2020 The British Red Cross Society £170k-£180k 2020 Age UK £180k-£190k 2020

Is it possible to work as a Paralegal when you are a Qualified Solicitor

  This question comes up all the time and is quite a common query that we imagine the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) are getting better at answering due to the sheer number of people asking the question. Many years ago the advice seemed a bit varied at times, but we have recently had a candidate who wanted to work in a locum role in the short term and waiting to go back on the Roll and get a practising certificate after some time spent outside the profession. She has been given fairly concise advice on whether she could work as a paralegal whilst waiting to be readmitted which we are repeating here. This article is written as a discussion point and is not intended to be advice in any shape or form. For full advice on your particular set of circumstances please speak to the SRA (or whoever else you like, but please do not depend on the information in this article!). The SRA have a simple online test to determine if you need a practising certificate and this i

What questions are asked in an Investors in People Assessment?

Recently Ten Percent Legal Recruitment was assessed for the investor in people accreditation. We worked very hard on this and spent some time as a company ensuring that all our procedures and policies were in place and that our staff were aware of the various requirements of the Investor in People process. We wondered how the assessment would go and also what the questions were likely to be during the interviews. The assessor was very friendly and explained from the outset what she was wanting to do and we were already aware that we would have thirty minute interviews with the directors and managers and twenty minute interviews with the staff. We also had the Investors in People programme so we were able to look and see what the actual questions would be based on, but there was nowhere to indicate what questions would be asked in the investor in people assessments. So if this helps anyone else, here are the questions we were asked in our investors in people accreditation: The assessor