Skip to main content

Law Firm Sales - making sure you are not the asset for sale

A recent law firm sale process has got us thinking about an issue that comes up quite regularly when it comes to selling a law firm, which is that very often a lot of the business coming into a firm for sale is flowing through and sourced by the person selling the practice.

A practice might have a senior partner, two or three consultants, junior fee earners and support staff. The owner will probably do the vast majority of the work but also it is likely he/she will also be the person who doesn’t want to carry on working once the sale has gone through. Sellers tend to expect a lump sum to be paid for the practice upfront and for themselves to leave and stop working within a period of a maximum of six to nine months.

Buyers on the other hand instantly see things differently. Feedback after some initial meetings can be that as far as they can see all the value is in the seller and there is very little else up for sale. The buyer cannot understand why a £400,000 turnover practice is for sale with a cash price of £200,000 if the main creator of all the work is going to be leaving the business within six months. As such, they can’t see any value and the most they can think of offering will be somewhere around the £25,000 to £30,000 mark.

This has happened a few times over the last couple of months and it is a common issue right across all kinds of business sale in all sectors. Countless business books have been written about the issue - planning for the future and extracting yourself from a business with maximum benefit. The main piece of advice is always that you should avoid making yourself the asset that is going to be up for sale.

Hire a Manager

This is easier said than done. I run businesses and I know how hard it is to recruit to take over my work so I can concentrate on other things, because I know as soon as I hand over part of the business that particular area will find the income dropping. I have the possibly inaccurate perception that someone else is not going to generate as much work as I do. It means that one day when I don’t need to work anymore and want to sell up, the value of my business is going to be lower than if I recruit staff who do that work and I simply manage the teams.

There are so many law firms right across the country where this is just not contemplated, for whatever reason, and lawyers carry on working without looking to take on other fee earners until they’re in their 70s and then seek to release equity from their practice even though they haven’t got a team to run the work if they retire.

Walk Away

This of course is all absolutely fine if your plan is simply to use the business to generate work and then when you want to stop you simply close down the business, pay the run off cover and walk away. No problem at all. However, if you want to sell your business and walk away with a lump sum from it, or you want someone else to pay the run off cover because it’s a huge amount of money, then you are going to need to think about this issue very carefully.

Step Away from Fee Earning

Do you really need to be doing the fee earning work or would it be better to simply find someone else to do that for you, and for you to concentrate on managing your business and growing it further? If you source a fee earner to do your work would you be free to spend more time generating new income streams?

Pros and Cons

Weigh up the pros and cons – the pros of doing it yourself are that if you do the work your business makes more money, you have no stress over paying staff, you don’t have to manage or supervise someone else doing your work, you know the work is going to get done properly. Cons – your business will be worth less when you sell it, you will not have any time to generate any more work but simply spend most of your time dealing with work you already have, your company will never grow substantially, your business will simply stay the same size.

Feeling Lucky?

I guess it all boils down to whether or not you are someone who likes to take risks. If you take a risk and employ someone to do certain types of work, if it doesn’t work out you can always let them go. If you don’t like taking risks then aiming at a disposal when you retire that simply results in someone else taking over the practice and avoiding run off cover is probably the safest and easiest thing to do.

I’m not always sure that the SAS motto of ‘he/she who dares wins’ always counts when it comes to business, but if you are thinking of selling in the next 10 years it is probably a very good idea to be thinking about whether or not you are the sole asset to your business, or whether there is a way that you can get out of this and set up a structure that you can then sell to someone else when you want to get out.

For further information and advice on buying and selling a law firm, please contact Jonathan Fagan Business Brokers at or by calling 0800 246 5016. We are always happy to have a confidential chat about future plans.


Popular posts from this blog

Overpaid Charity CEOs - top 40 of high paid employees - updated 2022

In 2014, we wrote an article about high pay in the charity sector after the Charity Commission started to require all charities to disclose pay of senior executives earning more than £60,000.    We have updated the list for 2022, with a comparison chart so you can see the difference between 2014 and 2022. We have included the source of the most recent salary levels and the year refers to the accounts year we extracted the salary information from.   2022 Top 40 Chart of High Paying Charities Charity Highest salary Year Consumers’ Association £390k-£400k 2020 MSI Reproductive Choices £240k-£250k 2020 Save the Children International £285k-£300k 2020 Cancer Research UK £240k-£250k 2020 The British Red Cross Society £170k-£180k 2020 Age UK £180k-£190k 2020

What does PQE stand for?

15.08.07 What is PQE, and how important is it to law firms? PQE stands for 'Post-Qualified Experience', and is usually given in years or half years for solicitors and also for legal executives as well. In terms of job advertisements, it was envisaged by various experts on age discrimination that it would no longer be an accepted method of describing vacancies by law firms, as it should not matter how many years experience you have for a post, rather it should be more based on your ability. However since 2006 and the new laws, very little has changed, because in reality solicitors need certain levels of PQE before they can undertake certain tasks. For example, a 1 year PQE solicitor is legally unable to supervise an office - they have to be 3 years PQE before they are allowed to, and also have passed a management course recognised by the Law Society (some solicitors believe the latter to be a simple money spinning operation by various course providers, but I could not poss

What questions are asked in an Investors in People Assessment?

Recently Ten Percent Legal Recruitment was assessed for the investor in people accreditation. We worked very hard on this and spent some time as a company ensuring that all our procedures and policies were in place and that our staff were aware of the various requirements of the Investor in People process. We wondered how the assessment would go and also what the questions were likely to be during the interviews. The assessor was very friendly and explained from the outset what she was wanting to do and we were already aware that we would have thirty minute interviews with the directors and managers and twenty minute interviews with the staff. We also had the Investors in People programme so we were able to look and see what the actual questions would be based on, but there was nowhere to indicate what questions would be asked in the investor in people assessments. So if this helps anyone else, here are the questions we were asked in our investors in people accreditation: The asses