Skip to main content

General Practitioners - a dilemna

General practice dilemma.

I took a call yesterday from a solicitor on the south coast who described himself as a general practitioner of whom there are very few left these days. He had a young family and wanted to maximise his earning potential, as his current firm were not paying him very much at all. In fact, I estimated that he was being underpaid by a minimum of £5000, and even then, that would be low for a three year P2E solicitor. His dilemma was that as a general practitioner, he had covered a whole wide variety of law and hence had no particular specialism in one area. This means of course when coming to look for an alternative job and with the increased specialism that has taken place in the legal market, he was left to decide what field of law to specialise in and wanted some advice on it.

He was dealing with a mixed case load of contentious and non-contentious work. Fortunately the non-contentious work was wills and probates and not conveyancing, as the market for conveyancing in a lot of areas is disappearing fast in the current climate.

My advice was, especially with a young family, to concentrate on non-contentious. Contentious work is not only less well paid until partner level, it also involves higher stress levels for the practitioners, particularly when undertaking advocacy. It also hinders any flexibility you may look for in future years, as it is much harder to be a part time litigator than it is to be a part time non-contentious lawyer.

Speaking as someone who worked part time as a litigator, it becomes very awkward when a regular client has a trial or a hearing on a day when you are not supposed to be at work, as not only do they expect you to be there, but also your boss does to cover that particular case.

So firstly with his young family, I recommended he considered non-contentious work.

I also recommended to him that instead of looking for general practice posts he should look for a specialised post, as I think that often firms will try to downgrade someone calling themselves a general practitioner, and offer lower salaries as a result. I’ve always found that anyone who calls themselves a specialist and looks at specialist roles will get a better paid salary although I appreciate that in small firms it is sometimes impossible to just do one area, and may need other areas covering as well.

If you are in a similar position, and your firm is not paying you sufficient money to cover even the smallest mortgage, it may be time to consider a move. The only way in the legal profession to generate large amounts of pay rises is either to set up on your own or go to a firm where there is the opportunity to take partnership within a certain amount of time. Obviously that is a different article for another day, but you could certainly think about both options, perhaps speak to your current firm about future partnership prospects before making that decision.

Jonathan Fagan is Managing Director of Ten Percent Legal Recruitment (www.ten-percent.co.uk). He regularly commentates and writes on the state of the legal profession and can be contacted for free careers advice or press comment at cv@ten-percent.co.uk

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Overpaid Charity CEOs - top 40 of high paid employees - updated 2022

In 2014, we wrote an article about high pay in the charity sector after the Charity Commission started to require all charities to disclose pay of senior executives earning more than £60,000.    We have updated the list for 2022, with a comparison chart so you can see the difference between 2014 and 2022. We have included the source of the most recent salary levels and the year refers to the accounts year we extracted the salary information from.   2022 Top 40 Chart of High Paying Charities Charity Highest salary Year Consumers’ Association £390k-£400k 2020 MSI Reproductive Choices £240k-£250k 2020 Save the Children International £285k-£300k 2020 Cancer Research UK £240k-£250k 2020 The British Red Cross Society £170k-£180k 2020 Age UK £180k-£190k 2020

Is it possible to work as a Paralegal when you are a Qualified Solicitor

  This question comes up all the time and is quite a common query that we imagine the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) are getting better at answering due to the sheer number of people asking the question. Many years ago the advice seemed a bit varied at times, but we have recently had a candidate who wanted to work in a locum role in the short term and waiting to go back on the Roll and get a practising certificate after some time spent outside the profession. She has been given fairly concise advice on whether she could work as a paralegal whilst waiting to be readmitted which we are repeating here. This article is written as a discussion point and is not intended to be advice in any shape or form. For full advice on your particular set of circumstances please speak to the SRA (or whoever else you like, but please do not depend on the information in this article!). The SRA have a simple online test to determine if you need a practising certificate and this i

What questions are asked in an Investors in People Assessment?

Recently Ten Percent Legal Recruitment was assessed for the investor in people accreditation. We worked very hard on this and spent some time as a company ensuring that all our procedures and policies were in place and that our staff were aware of the various requirements of the Investor in People process. We wondered how the assessment would go and also what the questions were likely to be during the interviews. The assessor was very friendly and explained from the outset what she was wanting to do and we were already aware that we would have thirty minute interviews with the directors and managers and twenty minute interviews with the staff. We also had the Investors in People programme so we were able to look and see what the actual questions would be based on, but there was nowhere to indicate what questions would be asked in the investor in people assessments. So if this helps anyone else, here are the questions we were asked in our investors in people accreditation: The assessor