Skip to main content

Using LinkedIn to Headhunt and Recruit new staff – does it work?


How long will LinkedIn last? Who knows? I imagine something else will come along sooner or later that does the same thing bigger and better. LinkedIn restricts certain access (eg contacting other people requires using up a limited number of contact credits) and I suspect another network will come along and do the same thing with free access and consign LinkedIn to the dustbin.
You would probably expect me to write something similar to the information below as it is in my company’s interest for you not to go directly to candidates and instead ask us to help you recruit and get paid a wodge of cash. However LinkedIn has been promoted as the next best thing in so many articles and advice documents recently (including whole courses on how to use it to recruit) that I thought an article injected with a bit of reality and anecdotal evidence may be of interest.
Here is a conversation I have on the phone from time to time.
Caller: “Hello can I speak to Jonathan Fagan please?”
Me: “Speaking – how can I help?”
Caller: “My name is Joshua and I’m calling you from Ant & Dec Rec to Rec Agency. Have you a got a few minutes for me to tell you about a fantastic opportunity you have been recommended for as a perfect fit?”
(
For the uninitiated “Rec to Rec” stands for Recruitment to Recruitment – ie a recruitment agency specialising in recruitment of recruitment consultants. Its big business…).
Me: “Yes sure. Tell me about it.”
Caller: “My client has a strong and consistent stream of returning clients and seeks a well established and experienced recruitment consultant to handle it. Your name has been put forward by one of your peers in the industry as someone who really knows their stuff. Would this be of interest?”
Me: “You do know I am Managing Director and part owner of a legal recruitment consultancy located in North Wales?”
Caller: “Erm no. Err – do you know anyone else who is looking at the moment for a job?”
Me: “You don’t actually know who I am do you?”
Caller: (ends call).
This is the reality of headhunting - companies surfing LinkedIn pretending to know who you are. I know of a few people who have been approached and so flattered by the fact that someone has expressed an interest in them they have joined a firm they would not otherwise have touched with a barge pole. Usually this is something they regret within a few months!
We sent a recruitment consultant on a headhunting course a few years ago and it was fascinating. You spend about half the day learning how to get past the “gatekeepers” (these are receptionists, secretaries and anyone who answers the phone) and the other half of the time learning how to pitch a vacancy to the “target”. It is cold calling and sales at the best of times, and a thankless task.
Most of the people you will speak to will definitely dislike you intensely and your chances of success are very slim. However if you are successful the rewards are good for recruiters – the usual fee for a headhunting placement is a payment up front of about £5,000 and then a percentage success fee on top. This can be up to 50%. After all the recruitment consultant (or salesman) is going to have to be very good to ensnare someone you may be interested in.
It works if the following happens:
1. You have a good vacancy.
2. It is one that has a very limited pool of eligible candidates.
3. You are paying at or above market rates for the vacancy.
4. Your business has a good reputation and is one that people would want to work for and not run away screaming from.
In these fairly limited scenarios it is possible to use headhunters effectively. I am sure that sometimes they are totally unnecessary; one of our local independent schools recently used one to recruit a new headmistress which to me seemed a complete waste of cash – surely a prestigious role like that advertised in the right places would attract a good range of candidates without needing to spend £000s of cash on a consultant?
I started this article talking about LinkedIn and this is the link – if you use LinkedIn to approach potential candidates you are doing exactly the same thing as the headhunters do – approaching candidates as a cold lead after searching for them on LinkedIn and then contacting them to try and sell a job to them.
Companies have started getting their HR departments to do this and I doubt very much if it has had much effect other than use up precious time that could have been spent more productively. After all most people who go into HR are not sales people. Most headhunters are sales people and spend years perfecting their skills.
We recently had a law firm based in South London get in touch to ask for a locum conveyancing solicitor to cover maternity leave for 12 months. We sent a mix of CVs across and they requested interviews with a couple of property solicitors. However the introduction went quiet. Later we discovered that the firm had gone on a tour of LinkedIn, using up a considerable number of 'InMails' to contact locums advertising on the site and checking availability. I know this because a number of our locums checked back with me to see if it was the same company. None were available in any event to assist.
I would imagine that you would need to be making about 30-40 similar connections before you found anyone who was vaguely interested and suitable in your role, whether locum or permanent. On LinkedIn this is an expensive exercise.
Recruitment consultants are slightly different. On the permanent side we maintain a database of candidates who have been registered with us for some time, some of them up to 17 years. This is because we run a database of active and passive candidates. Passive candidates are the type that we generate most success from. These are candidates who may not have realised they are actually looking for work until you dangle a particularly interesting vacancy in front of them.
Whenever law firms send us vacancies we mail them out to any suitable candidates from our database and post the jobs onto a range of job boards and across our network. We get the vast majority of our placements from passive candidates getting in touch to say that they are interested in a specific role in a particular location. We spend considerable time and money advertising vacancies, but these lead more to new candidates than to placements the majority of the time. This is important because it is our stream of candidates onto our database that generates future business. As an individual employer you do not really want to be making the same investment of time and effort as unless you are recruiting 100s of staff this will be a pretty pointless exercise!
LinkedIn is but one cog in our very large machine. You cannot use LinkedIn to get the same effect as we do. If you make contact with a candidate via LinkedIn then we think that they are often worried that their employer will find out you have been in touch and this will affect their career prospects. Chances are they will ignore your message. Advertising for jobs is very often only effective at introducing your brand to candidates rather than getting a vacancy filled. This means that they come to you when they are ready to make a move, particularly so for recruitment agencies.
So yes you can use LinkedIn to try and source candidates, and we wish you the best of luck, but make sure it is just one small part of your overall strategy. Whilst you may get some results, you will probably stand more chance of success advertising in the Law Society Gazette and also on your own website (something a lot of law firms seem to forget to do or fail to keep up to date).

Jonathan Fagan is Managing Director of Ten-Percent Legal Recruitment and a non-practising Solicitor. Ten-Percent Legal Recruitment provides online Legal Recruitment for Solicitors, Legal Executives, Fee Earners, Support Staff, Managers and Paralegals. Visit our Website to search our Vacancy Database.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Overpaid Charity CEOs - top 40 of high paid employees - updated 2022

In 2014, we wrote an article about high pay in the charity sector after the Charity Commission started to require all charities to disclose pay of senior executives earning more than £60,000.    We have updated the list for 2022, with a comparison chart so you can see the difference between 2014 and 2022. We have included the source of the most recent salary levels and the year refers to the accounts year we extracted the salary information from.   2022 Top 40 Chart of High Paying Charities Charity Highest salary Year Consumers’ Association £390k-£400k 2020 MSI Reproductive Choices £240k-£250k 2020 Save the Children International £285k-£300k 2020 Cancer Research UK £240k-£250k 2020 The British Red Cross Society £170k-£180k 2020 Age UK £180k-£190k 2020

Is it possible to work as a Paralegal when you are a Qualified Solicitor

  This question comes up all the time and is quite a common query that we imagine the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) are getting better at answering due to the sheer number of people asking the question. Many years ago the advice seemed a bit varied at times, but we have recently had a candidate who wanted to work in a locum role in the short term and waiting to go back on the Roll and get a practising certificate after some time spent outside the profession. She has been given fairly concise advice on whether she could work as a paralegal whilst waiting to be readmitted which we are repeating here. This article is written as a discussion point and is not intended to be advice in any shape or form. For full advice on your particular set of circumstances please speak to the SRA (or whoever else you like, but please do not depend on the information in this article!). The SRA have a simple online test to determine if you need a practising certificate and this i

What questions are asked in an Investors in People Assessment?

Recently Ten Percent Legal Recruitment was assessed for the investor in people accreditation. We worked very hard on this and spent some time as a company ensuring that all our procedures and policies were in place and that our staff were aware of the various requirements of the Investor in People process. We wondered how the assessment would go and also what the questions were likely to be during the interviews. The assessor was very friendly and explained from the outset what she was wanting to do and we were already aware that we would have thirty minute interviews with the directors and managers and twenty minute interviews with the staff. We also had the Investors in People programme so we were able to look and see what the actual questions would be based on, but there was nowhere to indicate what questions would be asked in the investor in people assessments. So if this helps anyone else, here are the questions we were asked in our investors in people accreditation: The assessor